It is Never a Good Idea for Tribes to Endorse Political Candidates

Recently, the San Carlos Apache Tribe and other Native Nations (Pechanga Band of Indians Chairman) have made headlines by endorsing political candidates in the upcoming 2024 presidential election. While these endorsements may seem like a strategic move to prioritize Indian Country’s needs, they come with significant risks that could have long-lasting negative consequences for our communities.

One of the most concerning aspects of these endorsements is the potential for tribal nations to put all their eggs in one basket. The San Carlos Apache Tribe, for instance, has endorsed the Harris-Walz campaign – despite keeping the border open, slow on MMIW initiatives, no broadband installation, continued inflation, high gas prices, and foreign war spending over our Tribal Nations. However, history has shown that political promises are often fleeting, and candidates who once pledged their support may shift their priorities once in office.

Furthermore, tribal endorsements of political candidates can undermine the principle of tribal sovereignty. By aligning so closely with one political party, tribal governments risk becoming overly dependent on that party’s success and, thus, vulnerable to shifts in the political landscape. This can lead to a loss of leverage and bargaining power, making it more challenging to advocate for tribal interests, regardless of which party holds power.

Sure, a tribal leader can and should participate in American politics and endorse candidates, but endorsing a candidate on behalf of their entire membership should not be encouraged.

It’s also important to recognize that while endorsements by tribal bureaucrats may bring short-term gains, they can alienate their tribal citizens with differing political views. Tribal nations are not monolithic, and our members hold diverse perspectives. By endorsing a particular candidate, we risk deepening divisions within our communities and weakening the unity essential for advocating for our rights and sovereignty.

Think about Canada or European governments. They do not endorse American political candidates, recognizing the importance of maintaining neutrality and focusing on policy actions rather than political platitudes. Tribal nations should focus on candidates’ records and actions rather than their promises or party affiliation.

Instead of wasting our time and resources on political endorsements, we should carefully examine the track records of all candidates and make informed decisions based on their actions, not their words. Weak leaders and empty promises have no place in the future of Indian Country. We must remain vigilant, holding all elected officials accountable, and ensuring that our sovereignty and self-determination remain at the forefront of our political engagement.

While it may be tempting for tribal nations to endorse political candidates in the hopes of securing a better future, the risks far outweigh the potential benefits. We must not be swayed by political promises or party loyalty. Instead, We The People should focus on advocating for our rights, holding all leaders accountable, and ensuring that the voices of all tribal members are heard and respected. Our sovereignty and future depend on it.